Soon we shall die and all memory of those five will have left earth, and we ourselves shall be loved for a while and forgotten. But the love will have been enough; all those impulses of love return to the love that made them. Even memory is not necessary for love. There is a land of the living and a land of the dead and the bridge is love, the only survival, the only meaning.
–Thornton Wilder, The Bridge of San Luis Rey (1927)
I’ve had this passage in my draft files for a long time. I pull it out every so often and read it several times. Did just that this morning.
It only has four sentences but those four say plenty. It always sets my mind in motion, sparking thoughts and questions.
To begin with, Thornton Wilder‘s book, The Bridge of San Luis Rey, did just that around the world when it was published in 1927. It tells the story of the 1714 collapse of a rope bridge in Peru in which five people fell to their deaths and how they came to be on the bridge at that moment. The novel follows a friar who sees the bridge collapse then goes on a search into the lives of those five, seeking some sort of deeper, spiritual answer that would justify why this tragedy had to occur.
Is there ever a justification for any tragedy?
That is one of the questions that came to mind but not the overriding one this morning. Today, the last line in this short passage is the one that got me: There is a land of the living and a land of the dead and the bridge is love, the only survival, the only meaning.
It made me wonder that if there was indeed a bridge between the land of the living and the land of the dead that only existed for each of us based on how much we have loved, will that bridge be there for me when that time comes?
If not, do I tumble into the void, falling forever in darkness, taking with me all memory of my existence?
Each of those is difficult question. For myself, I would like to think the bridge will be there for me.
But then again, how can one ever be sure?
I don’t think you can ever know with any degree of certainty. Just saying that you have loved enough does not make it so. It is much like those who claim religious piety then live their lives in ways that are in complete opposition to the religious tenets they espouse, believing that they are absolutely assured of a place in whatever their idea of heaven might be. As though they have earned enough points and don’t have to do any more, like it was a shopping rewards program.
I can only shake my head at the certainty they display. I used to envy those with such certainty. I no longer do.
I guess the best one can do is to love more in the time they have left on the runup to that bridge. Put in the time and effort so that those who you love will have no doubt. Think of it as adding a brace to the bridge you believe you have built.
But keep that question of whether you have loved enough to build that bridge forever in mind.
If you are unsure, as you should be, let your certainty spur you to love more.
And if your answer is yes, that you have loved more than enough, I would advise you to be careful when you come to that bridge. It might be a little wobblier than you expected.
I am not sure if this is what I expected to write from this Wilder passage. It’s one of those that could send you in a number of different directions. But I did what I did and will have to live with that.
Here’s a song that that has a bridge in its title. I guess I could have used the obvious choices today, the old Judds‘ song Love Can Build a Bridge being the first that comes to mind. It’s a fine song but a little too on the nose for me this morning. I am feeling a little spicier, like Red Hot Chili Peppers spicy. This is an acoustic version of a favorite, Under the Bridge. I think it might actually have to do with trying to build that metaphorical bridge.
That’s good enough for me this morning.
Now, git.











