A picture must not be devised but perceived. Close your bodily eye, that you may see your picture first with the eye of the spirit. Then bring to light what you have seen in the darkness, that its effect may work back, from without to within.
–Caspar David Frederich
***********************
I find myself identifying strongly with the words and work of the 19th century German painter Caspar David Frederich (1774-1840). His work often takes a symbolic stance with expansive landscapes that overwhelm the human presence in them and much of it moves toward the metaphysical. He , along with his British contemporary JMW Turner, were at the forefront of the movement from Classicism to work that reflected the inner emotional reaction of the individual to the world around them.
It was said of Frederich that he was “a man who has discovered the tragedy of Landscape.” I see this in his often moody and contemplative work. It is not painting of only a place or scene– it is more a painting of emotion, of some inner vibration triggered by what is before the painter. His brilliance is in capturing that inner element and revealing it to the viewer. It’s a rare thing, one that I think most painters aspire to obtain in their own work. I know that I do.
Frederich’s work fell from favor in the latter stages of his life but the coming of modern art movement whose many painters were greatly influenced by Frederich, brought him back to great recognition through the first few decades of the 20th century. Unfortunately for Frederich, in the 1930’s, his work was associated with the Nazis who mistakenly saw his work as being nationalistic in its symbolism. I know that the piece shown here on the right, Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog, is often associated with Friedrich Nietzsche‘s idea of the Übermensch or Superman. Even though Frederich died years before Nietzsche was born and almost a century before the Nazis usurped his art, it took several decades before his work regained the stature it lost due to this association.
But the inner message of his landscapes persevered and his paintings still resonate with their timeless qualities today. As they should.
I’ve never heard of this Nietzsche, but I’m glad for the introduction. I happened across a perfect example of what you say in your second paragraph just this morning, when I saw this photo.
My response was purely emotional, supporting your assertion that, “It is not painting of only a place or scene– it is more a painting of emotion, of some inner vibration triggered by what is before the painter. His brilliance is in capturing that inner element and revealing it to the viewer.” The fact that it was a photo rather than a painting makes not the slightest difference. The dynamic is the same.
Reblogged this on THE WORDS THAT MUST BE DELIVERED.