As I was finishing up the framing for the group of work I had recently completed and would be delivering in the next few days, I came to the last piece, 4 Windows, shown here. I realized that I hadn’t yet addressed the question posed to me a week or so back when I posted this painting on this blog. I had been asked how I would sign a group of small pieces– each piece individually or a single signature that blankets all four pieces?
I had always signed the pieces individually when I had done this sort of piece in the past so I thought I might simply go that route. But the question really made me think about my concerns about keeping this as it was, as a single piece rather than one that could be taken apart and made into 4 smaller individual paintings. I know that should not be my concern, that once the painting leaves my possession I have no control over how someone treats it. They could smash them, burn them, paint over them and there is nothing I can do. But that doesn’t mean I can’t somehow signal my intent for the piece, that I desire that this work stays as it is, intact.
This being the case, I decided that one signature that somehow bonded the 4 pieces together would be some sort of solution. This way there would be no signatures, save one, if somone decided to separate the paintings. I wanted it to be distinctive though, something that differed from my standard signature and signified my intent.
I decided to go with a signature in the bottom right corner of the bottom right piece in the group. It would be like my normal signature except that I would add the number 4 through the bottom of the line that normally encircles my name. That number would designate the number of pieces in the group. In the future, I can use this same method for signing similar pieces. Maybe that will keep these paintings intact through time, as I originally saw them. It might not be perfect but it works for me.
A perfect solution, thinks me!
I like your solution a lot. It communicates intent without being heavy-handed.
Some artists have gone to a lot of trouble to enforce their “moral rights” concerning the subsequent treatment of their work. Michael Snow managed to get the Eaton Centre to remove the red Christmas ribbons from the necks of his snow geese. 9http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_v._The_Eaton_Centre_Ltd.)
I guess he must have felt very strongly about it.