“I told you once that I was searching for the nature of evil. I think I’ve come close to defining it: a lack of empathy. It’s the one characteristic that connects all the defendants. A genuine incapacity to feel with their fellow man. Evil, I think, is the absence of empathy.”
– Gustav M. Gilbert, prison psychologist at Spandau prison, where Nazi war crimes defendants were held, 1945
********************************************
I know that the quote above sounds pretty dark for a character trait that most people would recognize as being positive but it has haunted me for some time. Empathy is something I take for granted as being a large part of everyone’s psyche and to think that there are are large segments of the population without the ability or the willingness to put themselves in others’ shoes or to imagine how the world looks through others’ eyes was disturbing to my simplistic worldview.
Disturbing , yes. Surprising, no. There was always ample evidence of a lack of empathy in the world and we have often exhibited a large capacity for cruelty and selfishness. Just glimpse through history or read the newspapers on any given day. There are scores of examples.
So I am not surprised so much as I am disheartened, especially when I came across a report that was released last year concerning a study from the University of Michigan that surveyed over 14,000 college students over a thirty year timespan, beginning in 1979. They were examining the degrees of empathy and found that over this timeframe that empathy had decreased severely among students, with the most dramatic drop taking place in the last ten years. Today’s college student is likely to be 40% less empathetic than students from 20 or 30 years ago. They are less likely to consider how they would feel in someone else’s situation, less likely to have concerns for others’ problems and less likely to feel pity for those being treated unfairly.
I know that this is only a study and may have large flaws in it so I am taking this with a grain of salt. But to contemplate those numbers and what it may mean for us as a society is a scary thing. Perhaps we need some sort of emapthy training, something that shows the young how to walk in the shoes of others, that explains how the suffering of one is the suffering of all. I don’t know. I just know that if these numbers are vaguely representative of the true nature of our youth then we are in for some tough days ahead.
Sorry for being so downbeat especially at a time when the world needs positive reinforcement. Maybe I’m using this as scare tactic. Whatever the case, we need to close the empathy deficit. You can take the U. of Mich’s Empathy Test and see how you stack up against the numbers. There are also several good articles online that go further on the results of this study.
For those of you with a bit of empathy here are the current totals on the ongoing auction:
Empathy training? I think we used to call it good parenting. (Please understand – I awoke with my tongue firmly planted in my cheek. Still…)
I take your point, but I looked at that Michigan test, and it was clear from the first three questions I’d emerge on the other side of it as one of the least empathic people on the planet. There are some loaded questions in there. If that’s the same test that’s been given all these years, I’d want another study of the actual behavior of people judged non-empathic. How questions are written is important.
Beyond that, I’m glad for your gesture re: the auction. I’m not able to bid, but I’ve made my contribution. Japanese television has done a better job than CNN et.al. of dividing coverage between the nuclear situation and earthquake/tsunami victims. I suspect that’s made some difference here in the flow of contributions.
Actually, good parenting is what I meant by saying that we need empathy training but didn’t really want to say. Thanks for saying it for me.
I know that there are questions that are iffy here ( because it is vitally important in how questions are asked) but I think it’s the fact that there has been a dramatic change in the responses over the years that is the point here. If it were simply a matter of the test and question structure the results would be somewhat consistent through the thirty years.
Is this an okay way to continue adding bids? I’d like to take Full Silence up to $625.
Why, yes, it is! Your bid is the high bid at the moment. Thank you!