I was asked yesterday if I talked to my paintings.
Interesting question.
I talk to animals. I talk to trees and plants. I talk to my car. I talk to my studio, which actually has a name. I talk to ghosts, present or not. Whether any of these things or beings listens is another matter.
But talk to my paintings?
It immediately brought to mind a section of a famous lecture that I had been reading recently and had really resonated with me. It was On Modern Art, delivered in the 1920’s by Swiss artist and a personal favorite of mine Paul Klee :
May I use a simile, the simile of the tree? The artist has studied this world of variety and has, we may suppose, unobtrusively found his way in it. His sense of direction has brought order into the passing stream of image and experience. This sense of direction in nature and life, this branching and spreading array, I shall compare with the root of the tree.
……..From the root the sap flows to the artist, flows through him, flows to his eye. Thus he stands as the trunk of the tree. Battered and stirred by the strength of the flow, he guides the vision on into his work. As, in full view of the world, the crown of the tree unfolds and spreads in time and space, so with his work.
……..Nobody would affirm that the tree grows its crown in the image of its root. Between above and below can be no mirrored reflection. It is obvious that different functions expanding in different elements must produce divergences. But it is just the artist who at times is denied those departures from nature which his art demands. He has even been charged with incompetence and deliberate distortion.
……..And yet, standing at his appointed place, the trunk of the tree, he does nothing other than gather and pass on what comes to him from the depths. He neither serves nor rules–he transmits. His position is humble. And the beauty at the crown is not his own. He is merely a channel.
This very much sums up how I’ve always felt about art, especially my place as an artist. A mere channel or transmitter. And when I look at my paintings, it is not in the form of a conversation so much as listening to what the painting has to tell me. I paint because I question and, at best, the paintings provide some answers and insight that I might not find or see otherwise.
So, do I talk to my paintings? Not so much. But do they talk to me? Yes. And I do my best to listen…
.

What an interesting perspective – that your paintings talk to you. That makes sense to me, experientially. I’ve had a few essays show up demanding to be written, and there are a few hanging around now that seem to enjoy nagging. 😉
I’ll have to think more about Klee’s words. They seem to suggest a passivity on the part of the artist that he may not have meant to imply. Then again, I have no expeience of painting, and it may be there are differences as well as similarities in the nature of the creative process for different disciplines.
Really a nice post – thanks!
Thanks for making me think about it.